Going into this reading, truthfully, I wasn't thrilled. I expected to be super confused and afraid of the truths Teresa Thonney had in regards to first year students writing mistakes and just the fact that it is an academic journal article. I can't be the only one that cringes when I hear those words. Fortunately, I’m glad that my expectations were not met. I really enjoyed reading this!
One thing I enjoyed reading about Thonney’s article was how direct it was. For instance I liked how, even though her introduction was not very interesting or did not provide any sort of anecdote, I appreciate how she got straight to the point by clearly stating her argument. I am aware that Thonney isn't addressing first years as her primary audience so she shouldn't be necessarily impressing me with her introduction but her writing style did remind me of how I’ve been writing essays all my high school years, mainly timed or in class. When I would write to my primary audience, my teacher, I also got straight to the point and did not have a formal introduction with an attention gainer or an anecdote. Thonney mentioned that writing concisely is a form of academic writers adopting a voice of authority.
I also found it interesting how Thonney wrote about the need for academic writers to respond to what others say about their topic. She discusses how writers need to join a conversation to show how they understand their readers concerns and just use previous research to support their argument. I couldn't help but think of what Rebecca Jones wrote about the what a good argument should consist of. Jones argued that good arguments should not be limited and one sided but that both pro and con should be open to each other’s claims.
Thonney seems to supports Jones’ argument by telling her audience that academic writers acknowledge that others might disagree with the position they’ve taken. Thonney says that using hedges allows the writer to sound less opinionated in their writing. Personally, I have never noticed the significance of those words and how they can alter the meaning of the entire sentence. I really like this strategy because it gives critics less room to talk negatively about your argument.
While telling her audience the effects of writing concisely, Thonney also define the term lexical words as meaning-carrying words. I’ve always used these words in writing but I never knew they were called something bizarre like lexical words! I just always thought I was shortening my sentence to make it concise. I never knew there was a name for this process. It’s great to know that I was doing this before I knew what the actual term was. In addition, I like how Thonney proves how common lexical words are in various texts such as in scholarly journals and cell biology.
Thonney uses plenty of rhetorical strategies such as exemplification, compare and contrast, and authorities and big names to demonstrate to her readers how vital her conventions are in order for first year students to succeed in academic writing. Her strategies help establish her credibility as an author as well evoke ethos in her readers.
It's really interesting to see how you relate Thonney's positions on argument to those of Jones. It never occurred to me to think about how the conventions Thonney discusses fit into the bigger picture of argument that we are studying.
ReplyDeleteI also found it satisfying to find my self already doing some of the things Thonney points out. Not only were these moments validating, they were also informative. I too, did not know that they were called lexical words.
As I notice you pointing out the rhetorical strategies that Thonney utilizes, I can't help but think about how I have started doing the same in my own work. As we learn more about arguments, I have started using more of what we have absorbed in class as well as in out various class texts. All of it really comes together in our blogs, I think.
I really liked how you related Thonney's academic writing to Jones' paper. Since Jones' writing is much easier to understand, by relating those, Thonney's arguments made much more sense to me. Writing concisely has never been my strong suit, as I like to throw my personality into my writing. I had always thought introductions were the typical hook, background, thesis, etc. that we have been taught for years and years. In stating that a catchy introduction is not necessary in academic writing, I got a little stressed. However, this is good advice that will help me write academic papers (even though my high school teachers would burn my paper if I had a bad introduction). I like that she encourages breaking these little rules, as I feel it will help me become a more serious writer.
ReplyDeleteYou really killed two birds with one stone on this one, Verna! I was baffled by such a word as lexical too when reading this monster of a piece. It was massive! I simply could not wrap my mind around the scholarly vocabulary used in the text and it made me feel a little bit small in a society that just keeps on growing. Knowledge is the door and Thonney most definitely has the keys. She opened the door not only to her primary audience of scholars, but secondary audience of students like us! Along with that is how you opened one door for me. Reminiscent of high school are the essays because those were just tedious and timely. Whether or not we met the deadline was on us and Thonney really reminds me of those good hour periods trying to cram my brain into a two-dimensional rectangle(paper). Keep it up!!
ReplyDelete